www.blueline.ca

 

 

January 2002 issue

 

 

Teens promise to drive safe under new program

 

 

Few occupations, other than morticians, see more dead teenagers than police. Police, if not first on the scene, are always on the scene of every fatal car crash and many of these involve teen

 

Teen-driver car crashes are the single greatest cause of permanent injury and death in teens in Canada and across North America for that matter. In Canada, teen-driver car crashes account for 30,000 serious bodily teen injuries and 400 teen driver deaths annually (Ministry of Transportation, 1999) and that’s a lot of carnage to say nothing of the social and emotional destruction.

 

While many programs preach the perils of unsafe driving and advocate responsible road use, there is little or no evidence to demonstrate that educational programs aimed at improving teen driver behaviour has any appreciable effect, though they continue to try, at great expense. They provide a “feel good”, but do not necessarily provide a “do good”.

 

A new report discusses this very issue. The following excerpt is taken from: 2001 US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) report. (The full report can be found at http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/outreach/traftech/tt261.htm )

 

States and communities conducted extensive youth drinking and driving programs in the past two decades. These programs seek to motivate youth not to drink and drive through positive means... Other organizations such as insurance companies, automobile manufacturers, MADD, and many others did the same through public education and specific program activities.

There is little direct evidence of the effects produced by these activities… There is no direct proof that most of the youth traffic safety program activities not involving laws and enforcement had any direct effect on youth drinking and driving. The accumulation of information, education, skills, and role models provided by these programs may have been a crucial influence in changes in youth attitudes, behavior, and crashes. There is no strong research evidence...

The report clearly shows that laws and enforcement alone affect teen driving behavior. A new initiative, the I Promise Program, has found a potent way to provide this in a palatable approach within the context of the strongest social entity available - the family.

 I Promise consists of a comprehensive parent-youth mutual safe driving contract and a rear window decal. The process provides parents with a structure for discussing and negotiating matters that correlate most with youth related car crashes. Upon completing and signing the contract, parent and youth seal their commitment by affixing the rear window decal to the vehicle, which asks the community to call a toll free number to report on driver behaviour.

 

Reports are taken by a call center and forwarded by mail to the parent to be dealt with as per the terms of the family contract. This encourages accountability between parent and teen and to the general community, key elements to the concept of enforcement.

 

The kit is primarily distributed through partnerships with automobile insurance companies, recognizing the mutual interest they share with parents – injury and loss prevention. Information about this initiative must be included with every new insurance certificate that goes out to a teen driver.


 George Cooke, president of the Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company,
Canada’s 10th largest, was the first to sign on. Distribution will begin in January 2002. Cooke also chairs the Insurance Bureau of Canada board of directors and is taking the lead in promoting the program. Discussions are underway with many other insurers both in the U.S. and Canada.

 The program has been developed with the input of persons representing hundreds of interested organizations including government, medical organizations, parent groups, injury prevention groups and police services. You can view the parent-teen mutual safe driving contract and over 87 letters of support many from law enforcement agencies across
North America at the website, www.ipromiseprogram.com .

 

Feedback from police has been overwhelmingly positive. They recognize that the program will have the same deterrent effect as a known radar trap. Should a negative report be made however, police also know that the parent has the immediate ability to respond with sanctions on the use of the car. Support has poured in from one side of Canada to the other. The program has a link on the local RCMP website on Vancouver Island and an RCMP officer in Newfoundland is assisting by finding an auto insurer to distribute the program. The Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation has awarded a research grant of $103,000 to help launch the program. Plan-it Safe, a research program of the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario in affiliation with the University of Ottawa, is conducting the research.

 

I Promise is the brainchild of social worker Gary Direnfeld. Direnfeld, who spent the better part of the 1980’s working with delinquent teens and later provided brain injury rehabilitation services for patients injured in car crashes.

 

Direnfeld is hoping to get the support of every law enforcement agency and insurance company across Canada. He urges interested people to urge their insurance company and broker to support the program, write letters of support, place links and information on it on websites and talk about it during traffic and safe driving presentations.

 

 

Gary Direnfeld can be reached at:

 

Gary Direnfeld, MSW, Executive Director

I Promise Program

20 Suter Crescent

Dundas, Ontario, Canada  L9H 6R5

 

www.ipromiseprogram.com

gary123@sympatico.ca

(905) 628-4847